Field Fisher Waterhouse

Can you really rely on your "No-Reliance" Clause?


November 2007




Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP

35 Vine Street
London
EC3N 2AA

Tel: +44 (0)20 7861 4000
Fax: +44 (0)20 7488 0084

www.ffw.com



European Franchising Network

EuropeanFranchising.com is an online information resource service for businesses considering using franchising as a way of developing their market in Europe.

Europeanfranchising.com offers a seamless one stop online service for all franchising matters within all EU Member States. It aims to save franchisors time, money and aggravation by making available to them relevant commercial and legal information on franchising in the EU. It is operated by Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP, the EU's leading franchise lawyers. It is edited by Mark Abell, Chairman of the European Franchising Network ("EfN"), who is recognised by Chambers and Partners Guide to the legal profession as the No1 legal adviser for the franchising sector.



Comments


SUBMIT

Many franchisors are, with good reason, nervous about misrepresentation claims.  If a franchisee's business fails, the franchisee will undoubtedly attempt to blame the franchisor.  It is also highly likely that at some point an allegation of misrepresentation will be made. 

To succeed in a misrepresentation claim, a franchisee will have to prove that a false statement of fact induced him to enter into the agreement and he has suffered loss as a result.  The inducement element is therefore crucial to the claim.  Franchisors often seek to protect themselves from misrepresentation claims by including a statement in their agreement that the franchisee has not relied on any pre-contractual statements when deciding to enter into the agreement. 

The courts have recognised the efficacy of no reliance clauses in franchise agreements.  For example, in the case of Fleet Mobile Tyres Ltd -v- Stone & Anor [2006] EWHC 1947 the High Court Judge held that, whilst a no reliance clause does not guarantee complete protection, the franchisee's task of proving that he did, in fact, rely on a pre-contractual statement in the face of a clear statement in the agreement that he did not, is made very much more difficult.

The recent case of Quest 4 Finance Limited -v- John Maxfield and Others [2007] EWHC 2313 tells a cautionary tale as it shows that a misrepresentation claim will not always be defeated by a no reliance clause.  The Quest case did not relate to a franchise agreement, but the principles will apply to any commercial contract.  In Quest, the court held that the Claimant could not rely on a no reliance clause to defend itself from a misrepresentation claim when the terms of the contract entered into clearly contradicted information given in the Claimant's brochure and the Defendant showed that he had relied on the statements in the brochure.

The Quest case should be a salutary reminder to franchisors that their no reliance clauses are not infallible.

Practical Lessons for Franchisors

  1. Regularly review your franchise agreement to ensure it is still protecting your business properly.
  2. Regularly review your marketing and promotional literature, and your franchisee sales pitch, to ensure that they are correct and up to date.
  3. Ensure you have documents to substantiate any statements and figures quoted.
  4. Consider investing in a Disclosure Document which is given to all franchisees during the recruitment process summarising the franchise offering and key aspects about the business.

For more information, or advice on how to minimise your business' exposure to misrepresentation claims, please contact Mark Abell or Victoria Hobbs.

 

Printer friendly version

To opt-out from future communications please visit: http://info.ffw.com/vtu/74s7771L92a81zb8287

This e-mail/publication is provided for information purposes only and is not a substitute for detailed advice on specific transactions and should not be taken as providing legal advice on any of the topics discussed, nor should it be taken as creating a solicitor-client relationship between the reader and Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP.

Please note that where this email/publication contains links to pages/items on third party websites, while such information may be available to be viewed and downloaded, this is subject always to the terms and conditions applicable to the particular website(s). Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP is not responsible for the content or operation of third party websites.

Copyright Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP 2007. All rights reserved.