|
Holiday - use it or lose it?
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has confirmed that workers who fail to comply with notice requirements for requesting annual leave (which may be under the employment contract or the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR)), could lose their unused annual leave entitlement at the end of the leave year. Employers are likely to welcome this decision, but should take careful note of the EAT's warning that employers must not operate notice provisions "unreasonably, arbitrarily or capriciously".
Under the WTR, a worker who wishes to take annual leave must give notice to his employer at least twice as many days in advance as the amount of leave he or she wishes to take. Employers are able to refuse the leave by giving counter-notice. These provisions can be varied by a "relevant agreement" (e.g. a contract of employment).
In Lyons v Mitie Security Limited, Mr Lyons worked as a security guard for Mitie Security Limited (Mitie). His employment contract provided that:
-
holiday requests should be submitted on Mitie's standard holiday request form;
-
where possible, holiday request forms should be submitted at least four weeks before the start of the holiday;
-
all holiday should be taken during the relevant holiday year and cannot be carried over to the following year; and
-
any holiday pay for holiday entitlement not taken in the relevant holiday will be forfeited.
At the beginning of March, Mr Lyons had nine days outstanding leave entitlement which needed to be taken by 31 March, which was the end of the holiday year. He sent a fax to Mitie requesting payment for those remaining nine days before the end of the leave year. He did not make a specific request for days and did not use the holiday request form.
When Mr Lyons found out that he had not been paid for the nine days, he sent a grievance letter. When his grievance was not upheld, he resigned and presented a claim for unfair constructive dismissal and for the outstanding holiday pay. The tribunal dismissed both claims and Mr Lyons appealed.
The EAT upheld the appeal. It noted that the absence of case law would suggest that employees have not been denied their reasonable requests for holiday entitlement, even towards the end of a leave year. It did confirm, however, the right to statutory leave is not inalienable and has been made subject to notice provisions in the WTR, which are also subject to any contractual variation.
The EAT noted the ruling by the European Court of Justice in Stringer and others v HMRC that, as reported in earlier Employment Updates, the Working Time Directive did not prevent national legislation from laying down conditions for the exercise of the right to paid annual leave, including even the loss of that right at the end of a leave year, provided that the worker actually had the opportunity to exercise that right. If the notice provisions were operated correctly, they could, as envisaged in Stringer, result in the loss of the right to untaken leave at the end of the leave year. However, as noted above, employers should not operate notice provisions in an unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious way so as to deny any lawfully requested entitlement |